Republican
Revolt!
by D.V. Bowden
07-02-03
Thomas Jefferson said, "A little rebellion now and
then is a good thing." On Saturday, June 28, 2003, I went to Montgomery to the anti-tax meeting sponsored by Marty
McConnell, former chairman of the Alabama GOP. It was held at the
ritzy Embassy Suites hotel, down by Alabama River, and witnessed
a Republican Rebellion in the making. What had begun as an anti-tax meeting grew into an anti-Riley furor. The tempo of the meeting
waxed and waned, but by the end, the atmosphere had been
completely radicalised. Speeches along the lines of "hate
the sin, love the sinner" gave way to shouts of
"Impeach Riley!" and calls for him to be excommunicated
from the Republican party. Magnificent!
John
Giles of the Christian Coalition was the first speaker, and he
was fairly direct and forceful in his denunciation of more taxes.
Subsequent speakers, including a lady representing the National
Federation of Independent Business and a tax lawyer, presented
a detailed analysis of the changes contained in Riley's tax
proposal. These details are important, but they're also
dull--the crowd began to go to sleep. All the speakers up to this
point has strongly opposed Riley's plans, but had stressed
being polite and civil to the Governor, and had not denounced
him.
Then came
time for audience participation, and things heated up. When I
mentioned Susan Hamill and her
nefarious plan to gain support for tax increases from churches
based on her twisted interpretation of the Bible, it brought a
loud hiss from the audience. Radio personality Russ Fine said that
being nice wasn't going to win this fight--we'd have
to get down and dirty with the tax-mongers, because they
won't fight fair. He then called for Riley to be ejected from
the party, to the cheers of the crowd. [Note: An important piece of information that did not make it into any of the mainstream news reports is that someone, presumably a pro-tax dirty-trickster, stole the registration forms from the Montgomery meeting. Riley's forces now have the names of everyone who attended, to put to who-knows-what use. The media totally ignored this astonishing fact.]
As I told
an AP reporter, it's good to see that the Republicans at the
state level have not completely lost their spines, as they have
at the national level. Now that Bush is growing the federal
government at an even greater rate than Clinton, and obliterating
our civil liberties to boot, the national Republicans are silent.
They seem to have completely forgotten all that rhetoric about
reducing the size of government and abolishing federal
agencies.
At least
in Alabama, when their Maximum Leader goes Caligula on them, the
Alabama Republicans have enough sense to revolt. Most of them
seem to realise that neither Riley nor any other Republican would
have been elected on a promise to raise taxes, nor will any
Republican be reelected if he supports tax increases. Alabamians
are fed-up with taxes and their bloated state government, and
they're sick and tired of listening to the state's
apologists beg for more revenue.
Libertarians often have the dubious pleasure of saying
"We told you so" when some harebrained government
scheme goes awry. Perhaps Republicans who
want to rescue their party from a train wreck would do well to
start listening and adopting more libertarian ideas.
For a
long time now, libertarians have known the score. Libertarians
know that spending has gone up 40% in the last six years.
Libertarians know that nearly every state has gotten itself into
a financial mess due to overspending, and that no amount of
revenue will fix the problem of lax spending discipline.
Libertarians know that government schools are inferior not
because they aren't funded properly, but because they are run
by government. Libertarians know that pouring money into Alabama
schools has been tried before, with awful results. Libertarians
in Alabama have warned about all these things many times in the
past, and been roundly ignored by Democrats and Republicans.
Libertarians even warned that Riley would be worse than a second
Siegelman administration, but were scoffed at by Republicans, who
were sure that getting "their guy" in office would
finally make a difference. The fact that he was vague on the
issues and refused to debate his Libertarian opponent was of no
concern to the Country Club crowd. Well, now they are feeling
betrayed. I know one rich Republican who campaigned hard for
Riley, and was even given a spot in the administration, but who
quit over Riley's about-face on taxes. I'm glad to see
that many Republicans in Alabama are willing to stand in
opposition to their leader when they think he is wrong. As the
saying goes, "If you stand for nothing, you'll fall for
anything."
Now is
the time for the Republicans to take stock of their party. Some
party loyalists have suggested that opposing the tax is suicidal
and will be the ruination of the Republican Party–they
council full support for the governor–"My party, right
or wrong." These sellouts, if heeded, will be the ruination
of the Republican Party in Alabama. Not that I would necessarily
mind. After all, the Republicans have happily cooperated with the
Democrats in suppressing the Libertarian Party through the
mechanism of Alabama's highly-restrictive ballot-access laws.
If they were merely committing political suicide, I would not
mind so much–I would consider it their just reward. However, the
outcome of a Republican united front in support of Riley would
probably be the passage of his massive tax plan, to the detriment
of all Alabamians. Thus, while Republican support for taxes would
surely help the Libertarian Party by driving disaffected
Republicans into our arms, I hope that the Republicans stand
firm. For the long-term good of the Alabama Republican Party, and
the state, the Republicans should take this opportunity to purge
their party of the "big-government" and
"progressive" Republicans, and adopt a small-government
attitude and free-market policies. Such a course would be a boon
to Alabama. And the first thing the new liberty-loving
Republicans should do to show that they are genuine in their
convictions is to open the political process to competition from
third-parties. If they truly have good ideas, they will have
nothing to fear.
|